PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDOG vs. BBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDOG vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RDOG having a 18.20% return and BBRE slightly lower at 17.71%.


RDOG

1D
0.34%
1M
2.54%
YTD
18.20%
6M
19.02%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
4.68%

BBRE

1D
0.53%
1M
2.02%
YTD
17.71%
6M
17.39%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDOG vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
18.20%0.95%4.57%10.38%-25.53%34.42%-10.01%21.54%-4.27%
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
17.71%2.09%8.24%13.85%-24.68%42.99%-7.55%26.06%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RDOG and BBRE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.88

The correlation between RDOG and BBRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDOG vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDOG
RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDOG vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDOGBBREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.67

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

8.48

-0.71

RDOG vs. BBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BBRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDOG and BBRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDOG vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than BBRE's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and BBRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDOGBBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.59%

-43.61%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-8.07%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-18.92%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.52%

-31.15%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-10.45%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.53%

+0.56%

Volatility

RDOG vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.52%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDOGBBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

5.31%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

10.28%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

13.98%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

18.81%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.04%

22.53%

+0.51%

RDOG vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDOG vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison

RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than BBRE's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.63%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
6.18%6.91%6.11%7.07%5.25%3.11%5.12%3.10%3.13%3.64%3.66%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDOG and BBRE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBRE has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to RDOG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs BBRE's -43.61%.

On 5-year performance, BBRE leads with 5.24% vs 2.54% for RDOG. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 5.24% return vs 2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RDOG.

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 2.63% for BBRE.

RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.11% for BBRE.

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDOG and BBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer