RDLAX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RDLAX (Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RDLAX returned 15.29%/yr vs 23.21%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RDLAX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.

Performance

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund (RDLAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDLAX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RDLAX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 15.29%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.21% annualized return.

RDLAX

• 1D: 3.04%
• 1M: -1.16%
• 6M: 1.97%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 1Y: 12.73%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 11.26%
• 10Y*: 15.29%
• ALL TIME*: 11.07%

FCGSX

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -4.42%
• 6M: 12.80%
• YTD: 15.70%
• 1Y: 35.19%
• 3Y*: 28.42%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 23.21%
• ALL TIME*: 20.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RDLAX Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RDLAX Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund	0.59%	18.41%	28.05%	40.80%	-27.93%	29.54%	28.33%	28.27%	-3.92%	28.84%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	15.70%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RDLAX and FCGSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.93

The correlation between RDLAX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RDLAX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDLAX

RDLAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
RDLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RDLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RDLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RDLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
RDLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund (RDLAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDLAX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.65	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	2.23	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.28	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	3.15	-2.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	11.58	-9.49

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDLAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDLAX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDLAX drawdown since its inception was -51.56%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDLAX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDLAX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.56%	-38.77%	-12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.93%	-10.42%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.85%	-26.07%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.07%	-38.77%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.07%	-38.77%	-5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.94%	-7.07%	+1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.83%	-6.92%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	2.83%	+2.16%

Volatility

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund (RDLAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) have volatilities of 6.06% and 6.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDLAX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	6.27%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	15.91%	-1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	19.98%	-2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.11%	24.00%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.40%	23.37%	+0.03%

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDLAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDLAX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

RDLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, less than FCGSX's 9.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	9.06%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%
RDLAX Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund	8.08%	8.13%	10.15%	5.75%	12.48%	25.33%	12.58%	8.06%	15.56%	13.13%	6.15%	13.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDLAX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, RDLAX and FCGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RDLAX or FCGSX?

FCGSX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to RDLAX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDLAX dropped -51.56% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.