RCTRX vs. SCFZX
RCTRX (Regan Total Return Income Fund) and SCFZX (PGIM Securitized Credit Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RCTRX returned 4.46%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for SCFZX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCTRX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SCFZX.
Performance
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTRX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SCFZX's 2.28% return.
RCTRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SCFZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTRX Regan Total Return Income Fund | 0.98% | 6.56% | 6.81% | 7.29% | -2.23% | 6.89% | 2.60% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 2.28% | 5.75% | 9.41% | 8.67% | -0.84% | 5.27% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTRX and SCFZX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020 | 0.02 |
The correlation between RCTRX and SCFZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTRX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank
RCTRX
SCFZX
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Total Return Income Fund (RCTRX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCTRX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 6.28 | -4.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 20.02 | -16.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.36 | 69.95 | -55.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCTRX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 4.09 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.98 | 2.78 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.34 | 1.37 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTRX drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum SCFZX drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTRX and SCFZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTRX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -17.20% | +12.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -0.31% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.96% | -0.93% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.66% | -4.13% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -1.06% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.09% | +0.28% |
Volatility
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison
Regan Total Return Income Fund (RCTRX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) at 0.42%. This indicates that RCTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTRX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.42% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.43% | 1.03% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 1.50% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.26% | 1.91% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 3.35% | -1.14% |
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTRX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTRX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison
RCTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than SCFZX's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTRX Regan Total Return Income Fund | 5.81% | 4.40% | 5.79% | 5.98% | 5.28% | 10.59% | 4.98% | 0.00% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 5.08% | 5.25% | 6.55% | 5.58% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.08% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTRX and SCFZX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCTRX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to SCFZX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTRX dropped -4.66% vs SCFZX's -17.20%.
SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCTRX and SCFZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer