RCTR vs. VOLT

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while VOLT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tema. RCTR is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

RCTR vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 34.45% return.

RCTR

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: -4.82%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOLT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 30.72%
• YTD: 34.45%
• 1Y: 52.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTR vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	3.29%	6.65%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	34.45%	6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and VOLT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

RCTR vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 86
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTR vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCTR	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.27	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.87	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.32	—

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTR	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.86%	-23.40%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.03%	-7.51%	-6.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-5.14%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCTR	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.75%	22.98%	+3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.75%	24.97%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.75%	24.97%	+1.78%

RCTR vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTR vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than VOLT's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.63%	0.36%	0.00%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.34%	0.46%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTR and VOLT in my portfolio?

RCTR and VOLT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCTR or VOLT?

On fees, RCTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCTR or VOLT?

RCTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCTR or VOLT?

RCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.34% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between RCTR and VOLT?

RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while VOLT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.75% for VOLT.