RCTR vs. PBOG
RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RCTR tracks the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index while PBOG tracks the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
RCTR vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 35.00% return.
RCTR
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.30%
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 35.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.29M | $3.21M | $2.88M | |
| $83.08K | $122.59K | $254.75K |
RCTR vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.61% | 1.17% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 35.00% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTR and PBOG is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTR vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
RCTR
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RCTR vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCTR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCTR vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, roughly equal to the maximum PBOG drawdown of -19.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.98% | -19.24% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -4.85% | -11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -5.21% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | — | — |
Volatility
RCTR vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.82% | 24.21% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 24.21% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 24.21% | +2.61% |
RCTR vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTR vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% |
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.64% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTR and PBOG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.
RCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for RCTR and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer