RCTR vs. NFTY
RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
RCTR vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.94% return.
RCTR
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -8.94%
- 6M
- -7.97%
- 1Y
- -7.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
RCTR vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 8.96% | 7.23% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -8.94% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTR and NFTY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTR vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
RCTR
NFTY
RCTR vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCTR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.28 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
RCTR vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -14.66%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.66% | -47.67% | +33.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.31% | -16.76% | +7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -9.58% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility
RCTR vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.62% | 14.73% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 17.38% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 20.71% | +5.91% |
RCTR vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTR vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than NFTY's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.94% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.41% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTR and NFTY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RCTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RCTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.41% for RCTR.
RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.80% for NFTY.
Find the right allocation for RCTR and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer