PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCTR vs. IGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCTR vs. IGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than IGE's 20.64% return.


RCTR

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.79%
6M
-9.50%
YTD
0.61%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.30%

IGE

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.23%
6M
7.72%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
37.76%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
18.99%
10Y*
9.50%
ALL TIME*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.25M$7.13M$9.70M
$83.08K$122.59K$254.75K

RCTR vs. IGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and IGE is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCTR vs. IGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCTR
RCTR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IGE
IGE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCTR vs. IGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RCTRIGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.15

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

9.73

-8.72

RCTR vs. IGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the IGE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCTR and IGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. IGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum IGE drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and IGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCTRIGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

-67.55%

+48.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-11.54%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.26%

-4.70%

-11.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-18.82%

+12.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

3.73%

+4.13%

Volatility

RCTR vs. IGE - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) at 3.97%. This indicates that RCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCTRIGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

3.97%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

12.88%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

16.57%

+10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.82%

22.23%

+4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.82%

24.86%

+1.96%

RCTR vs. IGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IGE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RCTR vs. IGE - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than IGE's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGE
iShares North American Natural Resources ETF
1.98%2.32%2.54%2.85%2.96%2.92%3.34%5.55%2.68%2.11%1.66%3.08%
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
0.64%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RCTR and IGE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCTR has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to IGE (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTR dropped -18.98% vs IGE's -67.55%.

On 1-year performance, IGE leads with 37.76% vs 9.71% for RCTR. On fees, IGE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGE has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IGE has performed better with a 37.76% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.

IGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.64% for RCTR.

RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while IGE tracks S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.39% for IGE.

IGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCTR and IGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer