RCT vs. ^SP500TR
RCT (RedCloud Holdings PLC) is a stock, while ^SP500TR (S&P 500 Total Return) is an index. Over the past year, RCT returned -92.53% vs 21.50% for ^SP500TR. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCT vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCT achieves a -87.32% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's 10.14% return.
RCT
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -20.92%
- 6M
- -82.82%
- YTD
- -87.32%
- 1Y
- -92.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -90.27%
^SP500TR
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^SP500TR S&P 500 Total Return | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $125.28K | $582.53K | $2.81M |
RCT vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCT RedCloud Holdings PLC | -87.32% | -66.89% |
^SP500TR S&P 500 Total Return | 10.14% | 22.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCT and ^SP500TR is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCT vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank
RCT
^SP500TR
RCT vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCT | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.27 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.21 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 9.49 | -11.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCT vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCT drawdown since its inception was -96.18%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCT and ^SP500TR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCT | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.18% | -55.25% | -40.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.79% | -8.89% | -83.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.05% | -1.41% | -94.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.22% | -8.14% | -63.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.86% | 2.07% | +56.79% |
Volatility
RCT vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison
RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) has a higher volatility of 22.89% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 3.52%. This indicates that RCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCT | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.89% | 3.52% | +19.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 117.47% | 10.11% | +107.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 155.83% | 12.87% | +142.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.35% | 17.01% | +175.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.35% | 18.07% | +174.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCT and ^SP500TR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCT has higher volatility (22.89%) compared to ^SP500TR (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCT dropped -96.18% vs ^SP500TR's -55.25%.
^SP500TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCT and ^SP500TR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer