RCT vs. NFLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX).

Performance

RCT vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RCT vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCT RedCloud Holdings PLC	-52.35%	-66.89%
NFLX Netflix, Inc.	2.55%	-2.36%

Fundamentals

EPS RCT : -$1.68 NFLX : $2.53
PS Ratio RCT : 0.53 NFLX : 9.23
Total Revenue (TTM) RCT : $48.04M NFLX : $45.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) RCT : $21.61M NFLX : $21.91B
EBITDA (TTM) RCT : -$52.72M NFLX : $30.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCT achieves a -52.35% return, which is significantly lower than NFLX's 2.55% return.

RCT

• 1D: 4.50%
• 1M: -31.07%
• YTD: -52.35%
• 6M: -60.77%
• 1Y: -66.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLX

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: -19.80%
• 1Y: 3.11%
• 3Y*: 40.66%
• 5Y*: 12.25%
• 10Y*: 24.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RCT vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCT

RCT Risk / Return Rank: 25
RCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
RCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RCT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RCT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NFLX

NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 43
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCT vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCT	NFLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	0.09	-0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	0.38	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.05	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	0.07	-0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	0.14	-1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCT vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCT and NFLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCT	NFLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	0.09	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.44	0.59	-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between RCT and NFLX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RCT vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither RCT nor NFLX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RCT vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCT drawdown since its inception was -85.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCT and NFLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCT	NFLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.79%	-81.99%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.16%	-43.35%	-40.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-75.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.15%	-28.20%	-56.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.73%	-24.85%	-40.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	57.29%	20.54%	+36.75%

Volatility

RCT vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) has a higher volatility of 32.55% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 6.96%. This indicates that RCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCT	NFLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.55%	6.96%	+25.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.33%	26.41%	+42.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	189.49%	34.11%	+155.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	192.33%	42.93%	+149.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	192.33%	41.66%	+150.67%

Financials