RCT vs. NFLX
RCT (RedCloud Holdings PLC) and NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) are both stocks. RCT operates in Software - Application (Technology), while NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past year, RCT returned -63.76% vs -33.07% for NFLX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCT vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCT achieves a -58.66% return, which is significantly lower than NFLX's -13.05% return.
RCT
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -9.53%
- YTD
- -58.66%
- 6M
- -60.00%
- 1Y
- -63.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLX
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -10.44%
- YTD
- -13.05%
- 6M
- -21.59%
- 1Y
- -33.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 23.40%
RCT vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCT RedCloud Holdings PLC | -58.66% | -66.89% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -13.05% | -2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCT and NFLX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
RCT:
-$1.68
NFLX:
$3.09
RCT:
0.46
NFLX:
7.52
RCT:
$48.04M
NFLX:
$46.89B
RCT:
$21.61M
NFLX:
$22.99B
RCT:
-$52.72M
NFLX:
$26.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCT vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
RCT
NFLX
RCT vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCT | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | -1.00 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | -1.40 | +2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.82 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.77 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -1.36 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCT | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | -1.00 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.57 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
RCT vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCT drawdown since its inception was -88.08%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCT and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCT | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.08% | -81.99% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.71% | -43.35% | -43.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.11% | -39.12% | -47.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -24.89% | -43.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.16% | 24.34% | +41.82% |
Volatility
RCT vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
RedCloud Holdings PLC (RCT) has a higher volatility of 27.28% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 7.24%. This indicates that RCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCT | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.28% | 7.24% | +20.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 95.64% | 25.66% | +69.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.76% | 33.14% | +169.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 195.77% | 43.11% | +152.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 195.77% | 41.52% | +154.25% |
Dividends
RCT vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
Neither RCT nor NFLX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RCT vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RedCloud Holdings PLC and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RCT and NFLX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCT has higher volatility (27.28%) compared to NFLX (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCT dropped -88.08% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
RCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCT and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer