PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCRIX vs. FLOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCRIX achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than FLOTX's -0.55% return.


RCRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.31%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*

FLOTX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RCRIX
RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund
1.91%5.56%10.01%9.85%-0.72%2.81%-8.51%4.46%45.17%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.55%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RCRIX and FLOTX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCRIX vs. FLOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCRIX
RCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
RCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
RCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RCRIXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.73

2.01

+4.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

19.90

2.92

+16.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

8.37

1.46

+6.92

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

28.07

1.41

+26.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

175.33

3.82

+171.51

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCRIX Sharpe Ratio is 6.73, which is higher than the FLOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCRIX and FLOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RCRIXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.73

2.01

+4.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.35

1.01

+2.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.24

-0.16

Drawdowns

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCRIX drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, which is greater than FLOTX's maximum drawdown of -4.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRIX and FLOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCRIXFLOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.00%

-4.40%

-25.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.19%

-2.36%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.93%

-3.34%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.75%

-4.40%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-1.03%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.87%

-0.84%

Volatility

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) is 0.21%, while Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) has a volatility of 0.43%. This indicates that RCRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCRIXFLOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.43%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.60%

1.34%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77%

1.67%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.60%

2.68%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.93%

2.46%

+5.47%

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCRIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOTX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

RCRIX vs. FLOTX - Dividend Comparison

RCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than FLOTX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.80%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%
RCRIX
RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund
4.95%5.30%6.85%7.90%3.80%2.34%3.16%3.36%49.16%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


RCRIX and FLOTX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOTX has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to RCRIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCRIX dropped -30.00% vs FLOTX's -4.40%.

RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.73 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCRIX and FLOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer