RCL vs. SCHA
RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) is a stock, while SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, RCL returned 15.99%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for SCHA. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RCL vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCL achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RCL has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 15.99%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.
RCL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 42.18%
- 5Y*
- 30.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.50%
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.45%
RCL vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 3.68% | 22.46% | 78.98% | 161.97% | -35.72% | 2.96% | -43.50% | 39.94% | -16.13% | 48.22% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.43% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCL and SCHA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.59 |
The correlation between RCL and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCL vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
RCL
SCHA
RCL vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCL | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.28 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 3.32 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 11.38 | -12.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCL vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCL | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -42.41% | -47.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.36% | -9.50% | -22.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.02% | -27.29% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.64% | -30.79% | -36.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.30% | -42.41% | -40.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -6.26% | -14.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.73% | -7.54% | -20.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.85% | 2.77% | +17.08% |
Volatility
RCL vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 5.84%. This indicates that RCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCL | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 5.84% | +4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.58% | 14.41% | +23.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 18.98% | +28.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.39% | 22.02% | +26.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 22.74% | +30.58% |
Dividends
RCL vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SCHA's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 1.75% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 2.22% | 2.66% | 1.81% | 2.08% | 1.33% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.06% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCL and SCHA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCL has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to SCHA (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCL dropped -89.49% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCL and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer