PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

RCDB.NEO (RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF) and RUDH.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCDB.NEO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by RBC, while RUDH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RCDB.NEO returned 2.22%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for RUDH.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCDB.NEO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than RUDH.TO's 7.63% return.

RCDB.NEO

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.07%
6M
0.93%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
—

RUDH.TO

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.90%
6M
6.69%
YTD
7.63%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RCDB.NEO
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF		1.12%3.75%5.58%5.68%-4.07%-0.68%5.61%0.58%
RUDH.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF		7.63%8.78%5.71%36.05%-20.27%46.37%0.96%11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RCDB.NEO and RUDH.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF

RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF

Often compared with RCDB.NEO:
RCDB.NEO vs. ZSDB.TORCDB.NEO vs. TSTX-U.TORCDB.NEO vs. RPF.TORCDB.NEO vs. RIDH.TORCDB.NEO vs. RBNK.TORCDB.NEO vs. VSC.TORCDB.NEO vs. RCDC.TO
Often compared with RUDH.TO:
RUDH.TO vs. RBNK.TORUDH.TO vs. RBO.TORUDH.TO vs. RCDC.TORUDH.TO vs. ZZZD.TORUDH.TO vs. BLOV.TORUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TORUDH.TO vs. DXU.TO

Return for Risk

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RCDB.NEO
RCDB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO
RUDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RUDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RCDB.NEORUDH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.33
0.80

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.92
1.15

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.07

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

2.67

+4.11

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the RUDH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCDB.NEO and RUDH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCDB.NEO drawdown since its inception was -8.31%, smaller than the maximum RUDH.TO drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDB.NEO and RUDH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RCDB.NEORUDH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-50.85%

+42.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-13.38%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.59%

-34.44%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.90%

-50.85%

+43.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-50.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-15.80%

+15.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-16.27%

+14.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

5.35%

-4.90%

Volatility

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) is 0.66%, while RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that RCDB.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUDH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RCDB.NEORUDH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

2.48%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

8.74%

-7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31%

17.96%

-15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

92.41%

-89.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.44%

88.21%

-82.77%

Dividends

RCDB.NEO vs. RUDH.TO - Dividend Comparison

RCDB.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than RUDH.TO's 1.57% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCDB.NEO
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF		2.17%1.96%1.58%1.22%1.16%1.33%1.68%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RUDH.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF		1.57%1.47%2.78%3.26%4.27%2.36%3.68%4.01%4.96%4.03%4.32%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

RCDB.NEO and RUDH.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCDB.NEO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while RUDH.TO is Dividend.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCDB.NEO and RUDH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer