RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO
RUDH.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF) and CWIN.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units) are both Dividend funds. RUDH.TO is actively managed, while CWIN.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, RUDH.TO returned 14.55% vs 40.37% for CWIN.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUDH.TO achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than CWIN.TO's 21.69% return.
RUDH.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
CWIN.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- YTD
- 21.69%
- 1Y
- 40.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RUDH.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF | 7.78% | 5.65% |
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 21.69% | 24.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUDH.TO and CWIN.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RUDH.TO
CWIN.TO
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RUDH.TO | CWIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.60 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 5.53 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 20.47 | -17.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than CWIN.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUDH.TO and CWIN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUDH.TO | CWIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -10.87% | -39.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -7.15% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.69% | -0.09% | -15.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -1.35% | -14.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 1.93% | +3.42% |
Volatility
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) at 2.77%. This indicates that RUDH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUDH.TO | CWIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 2.77% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 9.81% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 12.49% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.57% | 13.75% | +78.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.23% | 13.75% | +74.48% |
Dividends
RUDH.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Dividend Comparison
RUDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than CWIN.TO's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 3.08% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUDH.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF | 1.56% | 1.47% | 2.78% | 3.26% | 4.27% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 4.01% | 4.96% | 4.03% | 4.32% | 4.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RUDH.TO and CWIN.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for RUDH.TO and CWIN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer