RCD.TO vs. SPDG
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG).
RCD.TO and SPDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RCD.TO is managed by RBC. SPDG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Sep 11, 2023.
Performance
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 5.56% | 21.74% | 10.79% | 5.97% |
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF | 4.37% | 6.54% | 30.55% | 5.67% |
Different Trading Currencies
RCD.TO is traded in CAD, while SPDG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPDG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCD.TO achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPDG's 4.37% return.
RCD.TO
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
SPDG
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDG's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCD.TO vs. SPDG — Risk / Return Rank
RCD.TO
SPDG
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCD.TO | SPDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 0.61 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 0.92 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.13 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.93 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 3.07 | +5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCD.TO | SPDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 0.61 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.34 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCD.TO and SPDG is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Dividend Comparison
RCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than SPDG's 2.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 3.05% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.36% | 2.34% | 3.45% | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.01% | 3.08% | 3.62% |
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF | 2.94% | 2.87% | 2.61% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.07%, which is greater than SPDG's maximum drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD.TO and SPDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCD.TO | SPDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | -15.67% | -22.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -11.84% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -6.79% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -2.21% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.05% | -0.05% |
Volatility
RCD.TO vs. SPDG - Volatility Comparison
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) at 4.10%. This indicates that RCD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCD.TO | SPDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.10% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 9.42% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 16.23% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 13.70% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 13.70% | +0.77% |