PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) and VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOT.TO is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while VWRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOT.TO returned -0.36%/yr vs 14.13%/yr for VWRP.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBOT.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRP.L.

Performance

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while VWRP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRP.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than VWRP.L's 12.32% return.

RBOT.TO

1D
0.15%
1M
-8.02%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.35%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
—

VWRP.L

1D
1.68%
1M
3.15%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		1.60%8.45%13.13%36.79%-43.99%8.06%48.18%6.81%
VWRP.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating		12.32%16.95%27.57%18.84%-13.02%18.85%12.96%7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.TO and VWRP.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019

0.57

The correlation between RBOT.TO and VWRP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RBOT.TO
VWRP.L

Industrials

49.0%
11.0%

Technology

29.4%
29.0%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

5.2%
8.8%

Financial Services

1.0%
16.1%

Energy

0.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Industrials

RBOT.TO
49.0%
VWRP.L
11.0%

Technology

RBOT.TO
29.4%
VWRP.L
29.0%

Healthcare

RBOT.TO
9.4%
VWRP.L
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RBOT.TO
7.0%
VWRP.L
9.4%

Communication Services

RBOT.TO
5.2%
VWRP.L
8.8%

Financial Services

RBOT.TO
1.0%
VWRP.L
16.1%

Energy

RBOT.TO
0.5%
VWRP.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

RBOT.TO

-

VWRP.L
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

RBOT.TO

-

VWRP.L
5.0%

Real Estate

RBOT.TO

-

VWRP.L
1.9%

Utilities

RBOT.TO

-

VWRP.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating

Often compared with RBOT.TO:
RBOT.TO vs. XAIXRBOT.TO vs. ROBORBOT.TO vs. RBTX.LRBOT.TO vs. AIQRBOT.TO vs. AIGO.TORBOT.TO vs. CNX1.LRBOT.TO vs. FBOT
Often compared with VWRP.L:
VWRP.L vs. FWRGVWRP.L vs. VWRD.LVWRP.L vs. SWDA.LVWRP.L vs. FWRG.LVWRP.L vs. IWDA.LVWRP.L vs. SSAC.LVWRP.L vs. VUAA.L

Return for Risk

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
VWRP.L
VWRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RBOT.TOVWRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.70
2.24

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.15
3.22

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

3.46

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

13.58

-10.70

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.TO and VWRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than VWRP.L's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and VWRP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBOT.TOVWRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.86%

-27.38%

-29.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.78%

-8.06%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-16.83%

-13.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.86%

-21.18%

-35.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.11%

-1.22%

-12.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-4.36%

-17.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

2.06%

+3.85%

Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) at 4.03%. This indicates that RBOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBOT.TOVWRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

4.03%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.90%

9.87%

+9.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.31%

12.44%

+11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.67%

15.60%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.95%

17.39%

+7.56%

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRP.L's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. VWRP.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		0.13%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%
VWRP.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RBOT.TO and VWRP.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRP.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRP.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

RBOT.TO is categorized as Robotics, while VWRP.L is Global Equities. RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBOT.TO and 0.22% for VWRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOT.TO and VWRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer