RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L
RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and BLOK.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOD.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while BLOK.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOD.L returned 10.77%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for BLOK.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BLOK.L.
Performance
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RBOD.L is traded in USD, while BLOK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BLOK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 29.09% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK.L's 12.20% return.
RBOD.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 29.09%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 46.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 29.09% | 17.09% | 5.85% | 39.67% | -34.48% | 20.91% | 39.70% | 38.35% | -22.19% |
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 12.20% | 31.58% | 16.58% | 20.82% | -18.71% | 18.00% | 18.57% | 27.51% | -10.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOD.L and BLOK.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between RBOD.L and BLOK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
Industrials
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
Healthcare
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
Basic Materials
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
Consumer Cyclical
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
Communication Services
RBOD.L
-
BLOK.L
Consumer Defensive
RBOD.L
-
BLOK.L
Energy
RBOD.L
-
BLOK.L
Financial Services
RBOD.L
-
BLOK.L
Real Estate
RBOD.L
-
BLOK.L
-
Utilities
RBOD.L
-
BLOK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOD.L
BLOK.L
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBOD.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.10 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 11.68 | -1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBOD.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.24 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, which is greater than BLOK.L's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and BLOK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOD.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -34.22% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -9.86% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.03% | -14.14% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.50% | -32.06% | -12.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.43% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -6.57% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 2.62% | +1.87% |
Volatility
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that RBOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOD.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 4.96% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | 10.03% | +8.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 13.68% | +9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 16.44% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 18.18% | +5.43% |
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOD.L vs. BLOK.L - Dividend Comparison
RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while BLOK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.79% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOD.L and BLOK.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BLOK.L.
RBOD.L is categorized as Robotics, while BLOK.L is Technology Equities. RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while BLOK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.65% for BLOK.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOD.L and BLOK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer