PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBNNX vs. PYHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBNNX achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than PYHRX's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, RBNNX has underperformed PYHRX with an annualized return of 5.20%, while PYHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.


RBNNX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-1.76%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
5.20%

PYHRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.78%
1Y
7.99%
3Y*
38.08%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
13.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBNNX
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund
-1.76%5.82%14.95%11.36%-7.29%12.37%-6.60%17.29%-5.22%5.93%
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
2.44%117.46%8.13%14.73%-9.76%6.62%7.38%16.75%-2.85%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RBNNX and PYHRX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.48

The correlation between RBNNX and PYHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBNNX vs. PYHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBNNX
RBNNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
RBNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
RBNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PYHRX
PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBNNXPYHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.75

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

4.05

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

21.62

-20.06

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the PYHRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBNNX and PYHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBNNX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than PYHRX's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNNX and PYHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBNNXPYHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.31%

-27.80%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-2.02%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-4.21%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.55%

-14.08%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

-21.45%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-0.23%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-2.11%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.38%

+1.34%

Volatility

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Volatility Comparison

Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) at 0.70%. This indicates that RBNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBNNXPYHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

0.70%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.83%

2.03%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

2.50%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

45.86%

-39.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

32.63%

-22.18%

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBNNX has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PYHRX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBNNX vs. PYHRX - Dividend Comparison

RBNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than PYHRX's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
6.42%5.66%7.20%6.67%6.05%4.79%4.99%5.23%5.88%5.27%5.24%5.49%
RBNNX
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund
7.49%5.19%3.80%2.81%2.54%3.64%6.84%6.93%9.84%5.95%7.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBNNX and PYHRX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBNNX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to PYHRX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBNNX dropped -35.31% vs PYHRX's -27.80%.

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBNNX and PYHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer