RBNNX vs. CWFIX
RBNNX (Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund) and CWFIX (Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RBNNX returned 4.82%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for CWFIX. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RBNNX charges 3.92%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CWFIX.
Performance
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBNNX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than CWFIX's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RBNNX has outperformed CWFIX with an annualized return of 4.82%, while CWFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.86% annualized return.
RBNNX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.74%
CWFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 3.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBNNX Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund | -1.56% | 5.82% | 14.95% | 11.36% | -7.29% | 12.37% | -6.60% | 17.29% | -5.22% | 5.93% |
CWFIX Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund | 1.73% | 6.99% | 5.78% | 7.80% | -3.17% | 2.40% | 4.38% | 7.33% | 0.36% | 3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBNNX and CWFIX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBNNX vs. CWFIX — Risk / Return Rank
RBNNX
CWFIX
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBNNX | CWFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.81 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 4.10 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 21.65 | -21.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBNNX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than CWFIX's maximum drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNNX and CWFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBNNX | CWFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -12.41% | -22.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.10% | -1.13% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.02% | -1.37% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.55% | -6.36% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -12.41% | -22.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -0.21% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -0.85% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 0.21% | +1.81% |
Volatility
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Volatility Comparison
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) at 0.34%. This indicates that RBNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBNNX | CWFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 0.34% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | 1.24% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 1.51% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 2.76% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 3.07% | +7.36% |
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBNNX has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than CWFIX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBNNX vs. CWFIX - Dividend Comparison
RBNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than CWFIX's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWFIX Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund | 4.72% | 5.17% | 5.09% | 4.41% | 3.17% | 2.79% | 3.38% | 3.60% | 3.24% | 2.82% | 3.79% | 3.32% |
RBNNX Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund | 6.96% | 5.19% | 3.80% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 3.64% | 6.84% | 6.93% | 9.84% | 5.95% | 7.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBNNX and CWFIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBNNX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to CWFIX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBNNX dropped -35.31% vs CWFIX's -12.41%.
CWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBNNX and CWFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer