RBNNX vs. MDHVX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RBNNX (Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund) and MDHVX (MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RBNNX returned 5.16%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for MDHVX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RBNNX charges 3.92%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MDHVX.

Performance

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBNNX achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than MDHVX's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RBNNX has outperformed MDHVX with an annualized return of 5.16%, while MDHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.63% annualized return.

RBNNX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 6M: -1.91%
• 1Y: 1.59%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 4.92%
• 10Y*: 5.16%

MDHVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.85%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: 4.23%
• 10Y*: 4.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBNNX Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund	-2.15%	5.82%	14.95%	11.36%	-7.29%	12.37%	-6.60%	17.29%	-5.22%	5.93%
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund	1.85%	5.38%	6.51%	9.86%	-2.81%	4.38%	2.92%	9.00%	-0.13%	4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RBNNX and MDHVX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.48

The correlation between RBNNX and MDHVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RBNNX vs. MDHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBNNX

RBNNX Risk / Return Rank: 6
RBNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
RBNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RBNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RBNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RBNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MDHVX

MDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBNNX	MDHVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	2.56	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	3.80	-3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.66	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	4.37	-4.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.02	21.60	-20.58

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the MDHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBNNX and MDHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBNNX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than MDHVX's maximum drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNNX and MDHVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBNNX	MDHVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.31%	-18.04%	-17.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-1.06%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.02%	-2.65%	-8.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.55%	-6.26%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	-18.04%	-17.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	0.00%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-0.77%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	0.21%	+1.54%

Volatility

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Volatility Comparison

Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) at 0.39%. This indicates that RBNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBNNX	MDHVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	0.39%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.83%	1.26%	+3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.55%	1.80%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.83%	2.58%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.44%	3.42%	+7.02%

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBNNX has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MDHVX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBNNX vs. MDHVX - Dividend Comparison

RBNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, more than MDHVX's 5.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund	5.33%	5.47%	6.01%	5.53%	4.31%	3.80%	4.44%	4.37%	4.33%	4.03%	4.95%	4.87%
RBNNX Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund	7.52%	5.19%	3.80%	2.81%	2.54%	3.64%	6.84%	6.93%	9.84%	5.95%	7.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBNNX and MDHVX in my portfolio?

RBNNX and MDHVX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBNNX or MDHVX?

RBNNX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to MDHVX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBNNX dropped -35.31% vs MDHVX's -18.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.