MDHVX vs. MNHAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MDHVX (MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund) and MNHAX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MDHVX returned 4.63%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for MNHAX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDHVX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for MNHAX.

Performance

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDHVX achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than MNHAX's 2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MDHVX has underperformed MNHAX with an annualized return of 4.63%, while MNHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.79% annualized return.

MDHVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: 4.63%

MNHAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 8.24%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: 6.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund	1.75%	5.38%	6.51%	9.86%	-2.81%	4.38%	2.92%	9.00%	-0.13%	4.30%
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	2.17%	6.90%	9.29%	13.49%	-7.38%	10.27%	6.58%	14.25%	-0.98%	8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MDHVX and MNHAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012	0.71

The correlation between MDHVX and MNHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MDHVX vs. MNHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDHVX

MDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 93
MDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MNHAX

MNHAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MNHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MNHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MNHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MNHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MNHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDHVX	MNHAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	2.88	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	4.07	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.68	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.14	2.66	+2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.73	13.91	+11.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the MNHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDHVX and MNHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDHVX	MNHAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	2.88	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.67	0.39	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.36	0.64	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	0.68	+0.69

Drawdowns

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDHVX drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, smaller than the maximum MNHAX drawdown of -20.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDHVX and MNHAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDHVX	MNHAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.04%	-20.13%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.06%	-3.10%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.65%	-20.13%	+17.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.26%	-20.13%	+13.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.04%	-20.13%	+2.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.70%	+10.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-3.51%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.21%	0.59%	-0.38%

Volatility

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) is 0.48%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that MDHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDHVX	MNHAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.75%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.42%	2.31%	-0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80%	2.88%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.58%	14.42%	-11.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.43%	10.69%	-7.26%

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDHVX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MNHAX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDHVX vs. MNHAX - Dividend Comparison

MDHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, less than MNHAX's 6.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund	5.33%	5.47%	6.01%	5.53%	4.31%	3.80%	4.44%	4.37%	4.33%	4.03%	4.95%	4.87%
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	6.36%	7.29%	7.02%	8.59%	7.61%	9.81%	6.26%	8.24%	6.38%	6.20%	7.68%	6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDHVX and MNHAX in my portfolio?

MDHVX and MNHAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDHVX or MNHAX?

MNHAX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to MDHVX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDHVX dropped -18.04% vs MNHAX's -20.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.