PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLY vs. ZHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -45.56% return, which is significantly lower than ZHDG's 5.12% return.


RBLY

1D
-1.83%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
-45.56%
6M
-50.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZHDG

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.65%
YTD
5.12%
6M
5.49%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
-45.56%-24.82%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
5.12%6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and ZHDG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLY vs. ZHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLY

ZHDG
ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBLYZHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

0.51

-1.76

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than ZHDG's maximum drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and ZHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLYZHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-23.27%

-42.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.42%

-0.60%

-64.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.05%

-8.16%

-24.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

Volatility

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLYZHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.41%

10.27%

+42.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.41%

11.75%

+40.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.41%

11.75%

+40.66%

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHDG's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLY vs. ZHDG - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.58%, more than ZHDG's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
127.58%36.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
2.44%2.57%2.59%1.52%3.58%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLY and ZHDG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZHDG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZHDG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 127.58%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ZEGA. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 0.98% for ZHDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLY and ZHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer