RBLY vs. FTXH
RBLY (YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBLY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FTXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. RBLY is actively managed, while FTXH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. RBLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.
Performance
RBLY vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -45.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTXH's 5.00% return.
RBLY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -45.56%
- 6M
- -50.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 36.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
RBLY vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -45.56% | -24.82% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 5.00% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLY and FTXH is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLY vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank
RBLY
FTXH
RBLY vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBLY | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.25 | 0.38 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
RBLY vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than FTXH's maximum drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and FTXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLY | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -32.11% | -33.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.42% | -2.88% | -62.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.05% | -5.84% | -27.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility
RBLY vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLY | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.41% | 16.98% | +35.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.41% | 16.31% | +36.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.41% | 18.41% | +34.00% |
RBLY vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBLY vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison
RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.58%, more than FTXH's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 127.58% | 36.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLY and FTXH have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.
RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 127.58%, compared with 1.22% for FTXH.
RBLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTXH is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 0.60% for FTXH.
Find the right allocation for RBLY and FTXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer