PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLY vs. FTXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLY vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -45.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTXH's 5.00% return.


RBLY

1D
-1.83%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
-45.56%
6M
-50.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXH

1D
1.69%
1M
1.65%
YTD
5.00%
6M
6.02%
1Y
36.24%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLY vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and FTXH is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLY vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLY

FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLY vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBLY vs. FTXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBLYFTXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

0.38

-1.62

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than FTXH's maximum drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and FTXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLYFTXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-32.11%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.42%

-2.88%

-62.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.05%

-5.84%

-27.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

RBLY vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLYFTXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.41%

16.98%

+35.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.41%

16.31%

+36.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.41%

18.41%

+34.00%

RBLY vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLY vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.58%, more than FTXH's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.22%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
127.58%36.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLY and FTXH have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 127.58%, compared with 1.22% for FTXH.

RBLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTXH is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 0.60% for FTXH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLY and FTXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer