RBLX vs. PULS
RBLX (Roblox Corporation) is a stock, while PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, RBLX returned -14.41%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for PULS. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RBLX vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLX achieves a -54.34% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 2.43% return.
RBLX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -33.23%
- 6M
- -43.43%
- YTD
- -54.34%
- 1Y
- -71.69%
- 3Y*
- -0.43%
- 5Y*
- -14.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.78%
PULS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $152.11M | $125.14M | $128.48M | |
| $730.54M | $538.71M | $546.28M |
RBLX vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBLX Roblox Corporation | -54.34% | 40.04% | 26.55% | 60.65% | -72.41% | 59.94% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.43% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLX and PULS is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLX vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
RBLX
PULS
RBLX vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roblox Corporation (RBLX) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBLX | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -28.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 6.16 | -5.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 49.30 | -50.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 279.42 | -280.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBLX vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLX drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLX and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLX | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.79% | -5.85% | -76.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.85% | -0.09% | -74.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.85% | -0.34% | -74.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.79% | -0.79% | -82.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.86% | 0.00% | -73.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -0.09% | -53.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.14% | 0.02% | +48.12% |
Volatility
RBLX vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
Roblox Corporation (RBLX) has a higher volatility of 33.49% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.10%. This indicates that RBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLX | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.49% | 0.10% | +33.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.88% | 0.32% | +57.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.25% | 0.42% | +66.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.77% | 0.70% | +70.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.02% | 1.32% | +69.70% |
Dividends
RBLX vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
RBLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
RBLX Roblox Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLX and PULS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBLX has higher volatility (33.49%) compared to PULS (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLX dropped -82.79% vs PULS's -5.85%.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.60 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBLX and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer