RBLX vs. GDXU
RBLX (Roblox Corporation) is a stock, while GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Over the past 5 years, RBLX returned -14.14%/yr vs -14.73%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBLX vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLX achieves a -46.55% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.
RBLX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- -46.55%
- 6M
- -51.07%
- 1Y
- -54.46%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
GDXU
- 1D
- 8.84%
- 1M
- -50.11%
- YTD
- -56.00%
- 6M
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.87%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
RBLX vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBLX Roblox Corporation | -46.55% | 40.04% | 26.55% | 60.65% | -72.41% | 59.94% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -56.00% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -28.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLX and GDXU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLX vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
RBLX
GDXU
RBLX vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roblox Corporation (RBLX) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBLX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.18 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.37 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 0.80 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBLX vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLX drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLX and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.79% | -94.39% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.82% | -83.97% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.82% | -83.97% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.79% | -92.44% | +9.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.41% | -79.58% | +10.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.01% | -69.77% | +16.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.76% | 38.59% | +3.17% |
Volatility
RBLX vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is 16.92%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that RBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.92% | 54.28% | -37.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.88% | 123.72% | -75.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.45% | 142.00% | -82.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.18% | 111.92% | -42.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.06% | 110.82% | -40.76% |
Dividends
RBLX vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
Neither RBLX nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLX and GDXU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to RBLX (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLX dropped -82.79% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBLX and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer