RBLVX vs. BRUFX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RBLVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund) and BRUFX (Bruce Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, RBLVX returned 6.13%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for BRUFX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBLVX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BRUFX.

Performance

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund (RBLVX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLVX achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than BRUFX's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RBLVX has underperformed BRUFX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while BRUFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.57% annualized return.

RBLVX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 5.42%
• YTD: 7.35%
• 1Y: 15.37%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

BRUFX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.44%
• 6M: 12.23%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund	7.35%	14.63%	8.79%	13.89%	-16.25%	13.34%	4.04%	13.55%	-6.58%	9.91%
BRUFX Bruce Fund	15.33%	14.89%	4.45%	-0.74%	-8.80%	17.35%	12.06%	22.42%	-3.99%	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLVX and BRUFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.58

The correlation between RBLVX and BRUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RBLVX vs. BRUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLVX

RBLVX Risk / Return Rank: 63
RBLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RBLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RBLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RBLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RBLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BRUFX

BRUFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
BRUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BRUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BRUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BRUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BRUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund (RBLVX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBLVX	BRUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.39	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.42	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	3.36	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.50	14.90	-5.40

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the BRUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLVX and BRUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLVX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than BRUFX's maximum drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLVX and BRUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLVX	BRUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-44.50%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.77%	-7.67%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.41%	-9.66%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.67%	-17.91%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.42%	-25.44%	-0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.85%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-9.05%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.73%	-0.17%

Volatility

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund (RBLVX) is 2.88%, while Bruce Fund (BRUFX) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that RBLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBLVX	BRUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	3.11%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.88%	8.42%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.21%	10.78%	-2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.54%	10.57%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.82%	11.64%	-0.82%

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLVX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BRUFX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLVX vs. BRUFX - Dividend Comparison

RBLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than BRUFX's 5.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRUFX Bruce Fund	5.51%	6.35%	5.01%	6.46%	13.31%	9.25%	5.83%	2.03%	2.49%	4.11%	6.26%	4.63%
RBLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund	6.78%	7.12%	0.98%	1.42%	4.51%	15.03%	1.25%	3.42%	5.98%	5.64%	7.73%	10.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLVX and BRUFX in my portfolio?

RBLVX and BRUFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBLVX or BRUFX?

BRUFX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to RBLVX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLVX dropped -50.99% vs BRUFX's -44.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.