RBLU vs. INTW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RBLU is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, RBLU returned -96.05% vs 1006.96% for INTW. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RBLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

RBLU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLU achieves a -88.47% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 265.05% return.

RBLU

• 1D: 6.33%
• 1M: -63.24%
• 6M: -82.19%
• YTD: -88.47%
• 1Y: -96.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -74.71%

INTW

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -46.93%
• 6M: 132.81%
• YTD: 265.05%
• 1Y: 1,006.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 234.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	$147.89M	$130.41M	$215.01M
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	$3.87M	$2.37M	$2.31M

RBLU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	-88.47%	23.90%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	265.05%	77.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLU and INTW is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

RBLU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBLU

RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 97
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBLU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBLU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	6.48	-7.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.00	4.09	-6.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.50	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	14.71	-15.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	39.28	-40.62

RBLU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLU Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 6.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBLU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -69.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.97%	-69.16%	-27.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.92%	-69.16%	-27.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.78%	-62.43%	-34.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.52%	-30.68%	-17.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.70%	25.85%	+45.85%

Volatility

RBLU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a higher volatility of 82.34% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) at 47.63%. This indicates that RBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBLU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	82.34%	47.63%	+34.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	126.24%	116.67%	+9.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	135.50%	157.41%	-21.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.71%	150.45%	-22.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.71%	150.45%	-22.74%

RBLU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	11.23%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLU and INTW in my portfolio?

RBLU and INTW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBLU or INTW?

RBLU has higher volatility (82.34%) compared to INTW (47.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLU dropped -96.97% vs INTW's -69.16%.

Which ETF is better, RBLU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1006.96% vs -96.05% for RBLU. On fees, RBLU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, INTW has been the lower-risk option at 47.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RBLU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1006.96% return vs -96.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBLU or INTW?

RBLU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBLU or INTW?

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 11.23%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between RBLU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.48 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.