RBLU vs. FUTG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RBLU is passively managed, while FUTG is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RBLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.

Performance

RBLU vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RBLU having a -79.08% return and FUTG slightly higher at -75.53%.

RBLU

• 1D: -6.23%
• 1M: -20.33%
• YTD: -79.08%
• 6M: -84.26%
• 1Y: -86.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUTG

• 1D: -11.10%
• 1M: -70.24%
• YTD: -75.53%
• 6M: -77.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLU vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	-79.08%	-67.21%
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	-75.53%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLU and FUTG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

RBLU vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLU

RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 2
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLU vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBLU	FUTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBLU	FUTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	-0.66	+0.08

Drawdowns

RBLU vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -94.59%, which is greater than FUTG's maximum drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and FUTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLU	FUTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.59%	-86.19%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.16%	-84.29%	-9.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.88%	-40.35%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RBLU	FUTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	99.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.35%	136.01%	-16.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.21%	136.01%	-18.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.21%	136.01%	-18.80%

RBLU vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLU vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison

RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, while FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	6.19%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLU and FUTG in my portfolio?

RBLU and FUTG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBLU or FUTG?

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBLU or FUTG?

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBLU or FUTG?

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.

What is the main difference between RBLU and FUTG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 0.75% for FUTG.