RBIL vs. KSLV
RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) and KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while KSLV is a Silver fund actively managed by Kurv. RBIL is passively managed, while KSLV is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. RBIL charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KSLV.
Performance
RBIL vs. KSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than KSLV's 1.22% return.
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSLV
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL vs. KSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 0.56% |
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 1.22% | 48.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBIL and KSLV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBIL vs. KSLV — Risk / Return Rank
RBIL
KSLV
RBIL vs. KSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBIL | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBIL | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.28 | 1.17 | +3.11 |
Drawdowns
RBIL vs. KSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum KSLV drawdown of -44.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and KSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBIL | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -44.77% | +44.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -40.01% | +40.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -19.42% | +19.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
RBIL vs. KSLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBIL | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92% | 72.60% | -71.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.05% | 72.60% | -71.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.05% | 72.60% | -71.55% |
RBIL vs. KSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than KSLV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBIL vs. KSLV - Dividend Comparison
RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than KSLV's 16.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 16.53% | 4.42% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBIL and KSLV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.
KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 16.53%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.
RBIL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KSLV is Silver. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 1.00% for KSLV.
Find the right allocation for RBIL and KSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer