RBIL vs. KSLV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) and KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while KSLV is a Silver fund actively managed by Kurv. RBIL is passively managed, while KSLV is actively managed. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RBIL charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KSLV.

Performance

RBIL vs. KSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than KSLV's -20.45% return.

RBIL

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 2.36%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.88%

KSLV

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -5.25%
• 6M: -29.69%
• YTD: -20.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF	$1.37M	$1.37M	$2.38M
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	$1.11M	$1.90M	$2.32M

RBIL vs. KSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.68%	0.55%
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF	-20.45%	49.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RBIL and KSLV is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

RBIL vs. KSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

KSLV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBIL vs. KSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBIL	KSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.33	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.60	—	—

Drawdowns

RBIL vs. KSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum KSLV drawdown of -54.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and KSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBIL	KSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-54.73%	+54.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-52.85%	+52.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-25.30%	+25.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RBIL	KSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96%	68.65%	-67.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.06%	68.65%	-67.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.06%	68.65%	-67.59%

RBIL vs. KSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than KSLV's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBIL vs. KSLV - Dividend Comparison

RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than KSLV's 26.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF	26.96%	4.42%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.16%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBIL and KSLV in my portfolio?

RBIL and KSLV have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBIL or KSLV?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBIL or KSLV?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBIL or KSLV?

KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 26.96%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between RBIL and KSLV?

RBIL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KSLV is Silver. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 1.00% for KSLV.