PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBIL vs. HWAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBIL vs. HWAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than HWAY's 22.83% return.


RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.79%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HWAY

1D
0.93%
1M
3.11%
YTD
22.83%
6M
21.62%
1Y
42.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBIL vs. HWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBIL and HWAY is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBIL vs. HWAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HWAY
HWAY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBIL vs. HWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBILHWAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.39

1.37

+1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.00

3.39

+13.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

70.66

12.51

+58.15

RBIL vs. HWAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBIL Sharpe Ratio is 5.01, which is higher than the HWAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBIL and HWAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBILHWAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01

2.17

+2.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.28

1.25

+3.03

Drawdowns

RBIL vs. HWAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum HWAY drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and HWAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBILHWAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-25.96%

+25.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

-12.63%

+12.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-5.38%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

3.41%

-3.34%

Volatility

RBIL vs. HWAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.30%, while Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBILHWAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

7.31%

-7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

16.31%

-15.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92%

19.75%

-18.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.05%

22.42%

-21.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.05%

22.42%

-21.37%

RBIL vs. HWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than HWAY's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBIL vs. HWAY - Dividend Comparison

RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than HWAY's 1.05% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBIL and HWAY have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWAY has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBIL dropped -0.50% vs HWAY's -25.96%.

On 1-year performance, HWAY leads with 42.60% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HWAY has performed better with a 42.60% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HWAY.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.05% for HWAY.

RBIL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while HWAY is Industrials Equities. RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while HWAY tracks Solactive United States Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 0.29% for HWAY.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBIL and HWAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer