PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBIL vs. CBTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBIL vs. CBTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than CBTA's -27.03% return.


RBIL

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.29%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBTA

1D
-2.05%
1M
-11.17%
YTD
-27.03%
6M
-26.91%
1Y
-32.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBIL vs. CBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBIL and CBTA is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBIL vs. CBTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CBTA
CBTA Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBIL vs. CBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBILCBTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.15

0.81

+1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.33

-0.83

+8.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.56

-1.48

+42.04

RBIL vs. CBTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBIL Sharpe Ratio is 4.40, which is higher than the CBTA Sharpe Ratio of -1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBIL and CBTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBIL vs. CBTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum CBTA drawdown of -39.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and CBTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBILCBTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-39.06%

+38.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.56%

-39.06%

+38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-39.06%

+38.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-14.07%

+14.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

21.87%

-21.77%

Volatility

RBIL vs. CBTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.36%, while Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBILCBTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

6.84%

-6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.85%

24.02%

-23.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94%

29.30%

-28.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.07%

27.52%

-26.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.07%

27.52%

-26.45%

RBIL vs. CBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CBTA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBIL vs. CBTA - Dividend Comparison

RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than CBTA's 1.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBIL and CBTA have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBTA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBIL dropped -0.56% vs CBTA's -39.06%.

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.11% vs -32.38% for CBTA. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.11% return vs -32.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBTA.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 1.23% for CBTA.

RBIL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while CBTA is Defined Outcome. RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while CBTA tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 0.69% for CBTA.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBIL and CBTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer