RBFFX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Bond Fund of America (RBFFX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
RBFFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 4, 2008. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBFFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America | -0.80% | 7.49% | 1.47% | 4.65% | -13.03% | -0.64% | 11.07% | 8.13% | 0.17% | 3.53% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.29% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% | 3.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBFFX achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, RBFFX has underperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.53% annualized return.
RBFFX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBFFX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBFFX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
RBFFX
LSSAX
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America (RBFFX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBFFX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.61 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.49 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.41 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 10.00 | -5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBFFX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.61 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.25 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.95 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBFFX and LSSAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
RBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than LSSAX's 4.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBFFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America | 4.08% | 4.43% | 4.61% | 3.53% | 2.42% | 2.31% | 5.34% | 3.76% | 2.67% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.30% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.28% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBFFX drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBFFX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBFFX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -16.40% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.45% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -16.40% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.62% | -16.40% | -1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -1.53% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -1.98% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.84% | +0.18% |
Volatility
RBFFX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds The Bond Fund of America (RBFFX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that RBFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBFFX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.24% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 2.68% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 4.69% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 5.73% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 4.39% | +0.48% |