PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBCGX vs. DNVYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and Davis New York Venture Fund Class Y (DNVYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBCGX achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than DNVYX's 10.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCGX has underperformed DNVYX with an annualized return of 12.18%, while DNVYX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.


RBCGX

1D
-1.11%
1M
4.50%
YTD
7.07%
6M
4.96%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
12.18%

DNVYX

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.32%
YTD
10.56%
6M
13.42%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBCGX
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund
7.07%14.42%33.73%28.83%-30.06%-3.63%43.98%25.52%-3.81%24.73%
DNVYX
Davis New York Venture Fund Class Y
10.56%27.17%31.80%30.49%-17.34%12.74%11.68%31.35%-12.79%22.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RBCGX and DNVYX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 1996

0.77

The correlation between RBCGX and DNVYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBCGX vs. DNVYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBCGX
RBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DNVYX
DNVYX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DNVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DNVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and Davis New York Venture Fund Class Y (DNVYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBCGXDNVYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

4.16

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

16.09

-12.71

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DNVYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBCGX and DNVYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBCGXDNVYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.66

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.60

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.69

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Drawdowns

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBCGX drawdown since its inception was -77.12%, which is greater than DNVYX's maximum drawdown of -58.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCGX and DNVYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBCGXDNVYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.12%

-58.41%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-7.97%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.27%

-21.44%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.47%

-31.96%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

-36.97%

-8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.77%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-9.44%

-14.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

2.05%

+3.41%

Volatility

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Volatility Comparison

Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Davis New York Venture Fund Class Y (DNVYX) at 2.79%. This indicates that RBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNVYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBCGXDNVYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.79%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

8.73%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

12.45%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

21.91%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

21.12%

-0.58%

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBCGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DNVYX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBCGX vs. DNVYX - Dividend Comparison

RBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.58%, more than DNVYX's 10.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNVYX
Davis New York Venture Fund Class Y
10.09%11.15%31.98%7.88%7.54%21.48%5.93%7.63%23.81%8.39%12.88%22.87%
RBCGX
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund
15.58%16.69%7.84%0.00%6.27%7.33%9.93%4.67%21.03%8.16%9.06%6.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBCGX and DNVYX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBCGX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to DNVYX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBCGX dropped -77.12% vs DNVYX's -58.41%.

DNVYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBCGX and DNVYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer