RBBAX vs. DGTSX
RBBAX (Columbia Income Builder Fund) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, RBBAX returned 5.05%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RBBAX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.
Performance
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBBAX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than DGTSX's 4.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RBBAX having a 5.05% annualized return and DGTSX not far ahead at 5.07%.
RBBAX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.09%
DGTSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 7.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBBAX Columbia Income Builder Fund | 3.76% | 11.15% | 4.96% | 9.02% | -12.87% | 6.08% | 10.15% | 13.77% | -2.66% | 7.51% |
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 4.21% | 8.39% | 7.43% | 8.93% | -8.06% | 10.20% | 7.29% | 9.80% | -1.85% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBBAX and DGTSX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RBBAX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBBAX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank
RBBAX
DGTSX
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Income Builder Fund (RBBAX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBBAX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.02 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 13.04 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBBAX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBBAX and DGTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBBAX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -16.71% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.93% | -2.64% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | -7.46% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -11.26% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.06% | -11.26% | -6.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.28% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -1.64% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.61% | +0.36% |
Volatility
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Income Builder Fund (RBBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 0.91%. This indicates that RBBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBBAX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 0.91% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.86% | 3.01% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 3.65% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 5.98% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 5.23% | +0.60% |
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBBAX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBBAX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison
RBBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than DGTSX's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 5.81% | 5.54% | 7.28% | 4.75% | 2.77% | 7.62% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.99% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.50% |
RBBAX Columbia Income Builder Fund | 3.29% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.82% | 4.94% | 4.73% | 4.07% | 3.90% | 3.92% | 3.47% | 3.01% | 6.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBBAX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBBAX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to DGTSX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBBAX dropped -23.23% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.
DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBBAX and DGTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer