PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RB vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RB vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.


RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RB and TQQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RB vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RB

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RB vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RB vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.15

0.74

+2.41

Drawdowns

RB vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-81.66%

+79.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.76%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-18.52%

+18.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

Volatility

RB vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

47.60%

-41.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

66.53%

-60.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

65.96%

-59.75%

RB vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RB vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RB
ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
2.00%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


RB and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. RB tracks Russell 2000, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RB and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer