SYZ vs. FDM
SYZ (Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF) and FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SYZ is actively managed, while FDM is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SYZ vs. FDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYZ achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than FDM's 13.86% return.
SYZ
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
SYZ vs. FDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SYZ Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF | 19.52% | 0.54% |
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 13.86% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYZ and FDM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYZ vs. FDM — Risk / Return Rank
SYZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDM
SYZ vs. FDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF (SYZ) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYZ | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYZ vs. FDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYZ drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum FDM drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYZ and FDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYZ | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -63.45% | +55.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -11.32% | +9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility
SYZ vs. FDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYZ | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 18.84% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 21.40% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 23.36% | -6.47% |
SYZ vs. FDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SYZ and FDM have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SYZ vs. FDM - Dividend Comparison
SYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FDM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 1.21% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.08% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 1.45% |
SYZ Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYZ and FDM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SYZ and FDM have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.24% for SYZ.
They also come from different issuers: Lazard and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for SYZ and FDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer