PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RB vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RB vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.


RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RB and SMAX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RB vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RB

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RB vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RB vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.15

2.01

+1.14

Drawdowns

RB vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum SMAX drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-3.90%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.09%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-0.40%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

RB vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

2.67%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

3.67%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

3.67%

+2.54%

RB vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RB vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SMAX's 0.95% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RB and SMAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.95% for SMAX.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.50% for SMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RB and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer