RB vs. ABLS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000, while ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLS.

Performance

RB vs. ABLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than ABLS's 3.71% return.

RB

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABLS

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 1.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. ABLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.95%	10.58%
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	3.71%	-3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RB and ABLS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

RB vs. ABLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 9
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RB vs. ABLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RB	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.19	-0.20	+3.39

Drawdowns

RB vs. ABLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum ABLS drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and ABLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RB	ABLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-19.28%	+17.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-5.34%	+5.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-8.46%	+8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RB	ABLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.21%	17.35%	-11.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.21%	21.26%	-15.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.21%	21.26%	-15.05%

RB vs. ABLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

RB vs. ABLS - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than ABLS's 13.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	13.55%	14.04%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	1.99%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RB and ABLS in my portfolio?

RB and ABLS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RB or ABLS?

On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RB or ABLS?

ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RB or ABLS?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 13.55%, compared with 1.99% for RB.

What is the main difference between RB and ABLS?

RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ABLS is Small Cap Blend Equities. RB tracks Russell 2000, while ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.39% for ABLS.