PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAYS vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAYS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RAYS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
0.90%
1M
25.87%
YTD
77.13%
6M
75.61%
1Y
157.20%
3Y*
64.17%
5Y*
39.21%
10Y*
37.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAYS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
58.82%

RAYS vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAYS
SMH

Technology

66.9%
100.0%

Industrials

21.4%

-

Utilities

6.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

RAYS
66.9%
SMH
100.0%

Industrials

RAYS
21.4%
SMH

-

Utilities

RAYS
6.8%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

RAYS
4.0%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

RAYS
0.9%
SMH

-

Communication Services

RAYS

-

SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

RAYS

-

SMH

-

Energy

RAYS

-

SMH

-

Financial Services

RAYS

-

SMH

-

Healthcare

RAYS

-

SMH

-

Real Estate

RAYS

-

SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAYS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYS

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAYS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAYS vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAYSSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

Drawdowns

RAYS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAYSSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-84.96%

+84.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-41.09%

+41.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

Volatility

RAYS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAYSSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

30.56%

-30.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

35.01%

-35.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

32.57%

-32.57%

RAYS vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAYS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

RAYS is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RAYS and 0.35% for SMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAYS and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer