RAYS vs. SMH
RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAYS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Solar Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. RAYS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
RAYS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
RAYS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 58.82% |
RAYS vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RAYS
SMH
Technology
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
RAYS
SMH
Industrials
RAYS
SMH
-
Utilities
RAYS
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
RAYS
SMH
-
Basic Materials
RAYS
SMH
-
Communication Services
RAYS
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
RAYS
-
SMH
-
Energy
RAYS
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
RAYS
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
RAYS
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
RAYS
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAYS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
RAYS
SMH
RAYS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAYS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.34 | — |
Drawdowns
RAYS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAYS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -84.96% | +84.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -41.09% | +41.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
RAYS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAYS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 30.56% | -30.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 35.01% | -35.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 32.57% | -32.57% |
RAYS vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAYS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
RAYS is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RAYS and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for RAYS and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer