PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAYS vs. CTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAYS vs. CTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RAYS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTEX

1D
-4.08%
1M
24.08%
YTD
39.97%
6M
41.91%
1Y
154.30%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAYS vs. CTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


RAYS vs. CTEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAYS
CTEX

Technology

66.9%
34.7%

Industrials

21.4%
48.9%

Utilities

6.8%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

RAYS
66.9%
CTEX
34.7%

Industrials

RAYS
21.4%
CTEX
48.9%

Utilities

RAYS
6.8%
CTEX
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RAYS
4.0%
CTEX
1.8%

Basic Materials

RAYS
0.9%
CTEX

-

Communication Services

RAYS

-

CTEX

-

Consumer Defensive

RAYS

-

CTEX

-

Energy

RAYS

-

CTEX
3.0%

Financial Services

RAYS

-

CTEX

-

Healthcare

RAYS

-

CTEX

-

Real Estate

RAYS

-

CTEX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAYS vs. CTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYS

CTEX
CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAYS vs. CTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAYS vs. CTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAYSCTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

Drawdowns

RAYS vs. CTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CTEX drawdown of -70.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS and CTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAYSCTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-70.31%

+70.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.08%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-41.94%

+41.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

Volatility

RAYS vs. CTEX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAYSCTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

42.32%

-42.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

43.30%

-43.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

43.30%

-43.30%

RAYS vs. CTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAYS vs. CTEX - Dividend Comparison

RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
1.50%2.17%0.57%0.12%
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, RAYS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RAYS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CTEX.

CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index, while CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RAYS and 0.58% for CTEX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAYS and CTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer