PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAVI vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAVI vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAVI achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.


RAVI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.40%
6M
1.90%
YTD
2.02%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
2.70%

NRGU

1D
3.84%
1M
18.77%
6M
86.19%
YTD
118.00%
1Y
119.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAVI vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RAVI and NRGU is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAVI vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAVI
RAVI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
RAVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAVI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RAVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAVI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAVI vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAVINRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+21.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.21

1.26

+3.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

37.55

2.73

+34.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

214.47

6.13

+208.34

RAVI vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAVI Sharpe Ratio is 10.72, which is higher than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAVI and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAVI vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAVI drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAVI and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAVINRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-57.50%

+53.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-43.89%

+43.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.81%

+24.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-26.06%

+25.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

19.53%

-19.51%

Volatility

RAVI vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) is 0.13%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that RAVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAVINRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

23.48%

-23.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

63.97%

-63.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

76.98%

-76.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.41%

89.07%

-87.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.28%

89.07%

-87.79%

RAVI vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAVI vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

RAVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.33%4.59%5.34%4.55%1.70%0.90%1.29%2.53%2.22%1.28%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAVI and NRGU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU has higher volatility (23.48%) compared to RAVI (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAVI dropped -3.72% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 119.26% vs 4.37% for RAVI. On fees, RAVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RAVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 119.26% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

RAVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

RAVI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RAVI and 0.95% for NRGU.

RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.72 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAVI and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer