RAUS vs. MTUM
RAUS (RACWI US ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the RACWI US Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RAUS charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
RAUS vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAUS achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 22.55% return.
RAUS
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 22.55%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
RAUS vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RAUS RACWI US ETF | 9.37% | 4.73% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 22.55% | -0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAUS and MTUM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAUS vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
RAUS
MTUM
RAUS vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RACWI US ETF (RAUS) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAUS | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.81 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
RAUS vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAUS drawdown since its inception was -8.63%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAUS and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAUS | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -34.08% | +25.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -6.99% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -6.21% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility
RAUS vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAUS | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 20.03% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 20.77% | -7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 21.12% | -8.22% |
RAUS vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAUS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RAUS vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
RAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than MTUM's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.64% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
RAUS RACWI US ETF | 0.23% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAUS and MTUM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RAUS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAUS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.23% for RAUS.
RAUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. RAUS tracks RACWI US Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: RAFI Indices and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for RAUS and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for RAUS and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer