RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO
RATE.TO (Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund) and EGIF.TO (Exemplar Growth and Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RATE.TO is a Investment Grade Bonds fund actively managed by Arrow Capital Management Inc., while EGIF.TO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Capital Management Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RATE.TO returned 4.83%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for EGIF.TO. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RATE.TO charges 2.01%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for EGIF.TO.
Performance
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RATE.TO achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than EGIF.TO's 13.42% return.
RATE.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
EGIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$2.27K | CA$3.94K | CA$7.86K | |
| CA$63.23K | CA$64.17K | CA$66.35K |
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RATE.TO Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund | 1.38% | 4.60% | 5.59% | 10.12% | 2.34% | 2.46% | 3.49% | 6.56% | -1.53% |
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund | 13.42% | 15.83% | 14.66% | -1.77% | -8.22% | 17.42% | 7.67% | 6.94% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RATE.TO and EGIF.TO is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2018 | 0.04 |
The correlation between RATE.TO and EGIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RATE.TO
EGIF.TO
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO) and Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RATE.TO | EGIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 2.26 | -1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.60 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 12.63 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RATE.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.01%, smaller than the maximum EGIF.TO drawdown of -15.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RATE.TO and EGIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RATE.TO | EGIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.01% | -15.10% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.80% | -6.78% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.78% | -6.78% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.38% | -15.10% | +11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -6.55% | +6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -3.45% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 1.93% | -1.69% |
Volatility
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO) is 0.66%, while Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that RATE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RATE.TO | EGIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 8.70% | -8.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 10.76% | -9.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25% | 14.62% | -12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 9.27% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 9.08% | -3.35% |
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RATE.TO has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EGIF.TO's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RATE.TO vs. EGIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
RATE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than EGIF.TO's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund | 2.94% | 3.27% | 3.66% | 4.27% | 4.57% | 2.66% | 2.86% | 2.89% | 0.75% |
RATE.TO Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund | 4.66% | 4.60% | 4.69% | 4.74% | 4.11% | 3.52% | 2.98% | 2.99% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RATE.TO and EGIF.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGIF.TO is cheaper at 1.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGIF.TO is cheaper with a 1.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for RATE.TO.
RATE.TO is categorized as Investment Grade Bonds, while EGIF.TO is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for RATE.TO and 1.19% for EGIF.TO.
Find the right allocation for RATE.TO and EGIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer