EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EGIF.TO (Exemplar Growth and Income Fund) and HBAL.TO (Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGIF.TO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Capital Management Inc., while HBAL.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGIF.TO returned 7.05%/yr vs 7.20%/yr for HBAL.TO. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EGIF.TO charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HBAL.TO.

Performance

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO) and Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGIF.TO achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than HBAL.TO's 7.78% return.

EGIF.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -6.55%
• 6M: 6.32%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.96%

HBAL.TO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -1.95%
• 6M: 6.23%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 1Y: 16.85%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund	CA$2.27K	CA$3.94K	CA$7.86K
HBAL.TO Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF	CA$44.42K	CA$117.95K	CA$91.49K

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund	13.42%	15.83%	14.66%	-1.77%	-8.22%	17.42%	7.67%	6.94%	0.66%
HBAL.TO Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF	7.78%	13.57%	16.65%	15.31%	-17.70%	14.70%	15.50%	20.42%	-8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EGIF.TO and HBAL.TO is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018	0.05

Return for Risk

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EGIF.TO

EGIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
EGIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EGIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EGIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EGIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EGIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

HBAL.TO

HBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
HBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
HBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
HBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO) and Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGIF.TO	HBAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.88	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.67	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.26	1.35	+0.91
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	2.79	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.63	10.90	+1.73

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the HBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGIF.TO and HBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.10%, smaller than the maximum HBAL.TO drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGIF.TO and HBAL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGIF.TO	HBAL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.10%	-22.49%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.78%	-5.80%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.78%	-9.29%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.10%	-22.11%	+7.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.55%	-1.95%	-4.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-4.47%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.48%	+0.45%

Volatility

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO) at 2.59%. This indicates that EGIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGIF.TO	HBAL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.70%	2.59%	+6.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	7.32%	+3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	8.61%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.27%	10.49%	-1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.08%	12.11%	-3.03%

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGIF.TO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than HBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGIF.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

EGIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than HBAL.TO's 2.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund	2.94%	3.27%	3.66%	4.27%	4.57%	2.66%	2.86%	2.89%	0.75%
HBAL.TO Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF	2.29%	2.41%	2.28%	0.87%	0.03%	0.06%	0.04%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGIF.TO and HBAL.TO in my portfolio?

EGIF.TO and HBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EGIF.TO or HBAL.TO?

On fees, HBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGIF.TO or HBAL.TO?

HBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for EGIF.TO.

What is the main difference between EGIF.TO and HBAL.TO?

EGIF.TO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HBAL.TO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Arrow Capital Management Inc. and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for EGIF.TO and 0.20% for HBAL.TO.