RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RATE.TO (Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund) and PFLS.TO (Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RATE.TO is a fund fund, while PFLS.TO is a fund fund. Over the past 5 years, RATE.TO returned 6.03%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFLS.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RATE.TO achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than PFLS.TO's 6.07% return.

RATE.TO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 3.64%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: —

PFLS.TO

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 6.07%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RATE.TO Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund	1.10%	4.60%	7.87%	13.19%	3.24%	2.46%	5.24%
PFLS.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund	6.07%	13.69%	19.22%	6.68%	0.48%	18.51%	20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RATE.TO and PFLS.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020	0.02

The correlation between RATE.TO and PFLS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RATE.TO

RATE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 62
RATE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RATE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RATE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RATE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RATE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

PFLS.TO

PFLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
PFLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PFLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PFLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PFLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PFLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RATE.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.77	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.52	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.57	2.30	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.31	9.72	+5.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RATE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the PFLS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RATE.TO and PFLS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RATE.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.77	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.50	0.82	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.09	-0.24

Drawdowns

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RATE.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.01%, which is greater than PFLS.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RATE.TO and PFLS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RATE.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.01%	-11.82%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.80%	-6.98%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.70%	-9.40%	+7.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.38%	-11.82%	+8.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.49%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-2.37%	+1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	1.65%	-1.41%

Volatility

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO) is 0.74%, while Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that RATE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RATE.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	2.52%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.85%	7.29%	-5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	9.08%	-6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.03%	13.05%	-9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.75%	13.42%	-7.67%

Dividends

RATE.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Dividend Comparison

RATE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while PFLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PFLS.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RATE.TO Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund	4.64%	4.60%	5.68%	7.43%	4.97%	3.52%	2.98%	2.99%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RATE.TO and PFLS.TO in my portfolio?

RATE.TO and PFLS.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.