RALIX vs. BPGLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RALIX (Lazard Real Assets Portfolio) and BPGLX (UBS Global Allocation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, RALIX returned 7.10%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for BPGLX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RALIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BPGLX.

Performance

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RALIX achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than BPGLX's 9.08% return.

RALIX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 13.20%
• 1Y: 21.91%
• 3Y*: 13.38%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: —

BPGLX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 9.08%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 25.54%
• 3Y*: 14.74%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 7.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RALIX Lazard Real Assets Portfolio	12.25%	15.60%	5.91%	4.43%	-8.99%	22.32%	0.61%	16.07%	-7.59%	8.60%
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	9.08%	19.02%	8.56%	9.69%	-16.82%	8.09%	13.84%	19.05%	-7.56%	16.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RALIX and BPGLX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between RALIX and BPGLX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RALIX vs. BPGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RALIX

RALIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
RALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

BPGLX

BPGLX Risk / Return Rank: 74
BPGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BPGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BPGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BPGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BPGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RALIX	BPGLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.69	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.75	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.51	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	3.09	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.71	13.00	+2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RALIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the BPGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RALIX and BPGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RALIX	BPGLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.69	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.54	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.52	+0.10

Drawdowns

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RALIX drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum BPGLX drawdown of -53.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RALIX and BPGLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RALIX	BPGLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-53.03%	+29.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.46%	-8.99%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.72%	-11.25%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.03%	-22.24%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	0.00%	-2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-5.78%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	2.06%	-0.68%

Volatility

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) at 2.77%. This indicates that RALIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RALIX	BPGLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	2.77%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.76%	8.55%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.61%	10.33%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	10.62%	+1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	10.83%	+0.34%

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RALIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BPGLX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RALIX vs. BPGLX - Dividend Comparison

RALIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than BPGLX's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	1.90%	2.08%	2.02%	2.37%	4.65%	18.98%	1.78%	7.15%	0.00%	1.64%	2.42%	2.83%
RALIX Lazard Real Assets Portfolio	7.86%	7.04%	3.07%	2.93%	7.65%	11.84%	3.93%	2.24%	5.27%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RALIX and BPGLX in my portfolio?

RALIX and BPGLX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RALIX or BPGLX?

RALIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to BPGLX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RALIX dropped -24.00% vs BPGLX's -53.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BPGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.