BPGLX vs. PCLCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BPGLX (UBS Global Allocation Fund) and PCLCX (PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments) are both mutual funds - BPGLX is a Global Allocation fund managed by UBS, while PCLCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by UBS. Over the past 10 years, BPGLX returned 7.22%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for PCLCX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BPGLX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for PCLCX.

Performance

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGLX achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than PCLCX's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BPGLX has underperformed PCLCX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while PCLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.

BPGLX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -0.48%
• 6M: 3.85%
• YTD: 6.81%
• 1Y: 18.15%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 7.22%
• ALL TIME*: 6.31%

PCLCX

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -3.71%
• 6M: -1.68%
• YTD: -3.77%
• 1Y: -0.40%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: 13.53%
• ALL TIME*: 8.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	6.81%	19.02%	8.56%	9.69%	-16.82%	8.09%	13.84%	19.05%	-7.56%	17.08%
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments	-3.77%	9.86%	28.05%	35.17%	-28.18%	20.18%	39.70%	31.99%	-3.18%	29.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGLX and PCLCX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996	0.78

The correlation between BPGLX and PCLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BPGLX vs. PCLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BPGLX

BPGLX Risk / Return Rank: 68
BPGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BPGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BPGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BPGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BPGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PCLCX

PCLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
PCLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PCLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PCLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PCLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PCLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPGLX	PCLCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	-0.02	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	0.10	+2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.01	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	-0.02	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	-0.04	+8.37

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the PCLCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGLX and PCLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGLX drawdown since its inception was -53.03%, smaller than the maximum PCLCX drawdown of -63.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGLX and PCLCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPGLX	PCLCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.03%	-63.98%	+10.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-17.06%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.25%	-21.26%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.24%	-38.81%	+16.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.37%	-38.81%	+15.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-8.38%	+6.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-20.26%	+14.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	6.07%	-3.86%

Volatility

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) is 2.97%, while PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that BPGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPGLX	PCLCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	7.29%	-4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	13.90%	-4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	17.08%	-5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.78%	37.17%	-26.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.87%	31.09%	-20.22%

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGLX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLCX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPGLX vs. PCLCX - Dividend Comparison

BPGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than PCLCX's 21.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	1.94%	2.08%	2.02%	2.37%	4.65%	18.98%	1.78%	7.15%	0.00%	1.64%	2.42%	2.83%
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments	21.46%	20.66%	11.94%	2.09%	60.17%	22.81%	18.38%	16.53%	22.05%	10.32%	3.30%	17.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPGLX and PCLCX in my portfolio?

BPGLX and PCLCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPGLX or PCLCX?

PCLCX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to BPGLX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGLX dropped -53.03% vs PCLCX's -63.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BPGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.