BPGLX vs. PCMNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BPGLX (UBS Global Allocation Fund) and PCMNX (PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments) are both mutual funds - BPGLX is a Global Allocation fund managed by UBS, while PCMNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by UBS. Over the past 10 years, BPGLX returned 7.82%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for PCMNX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BPGLX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for PCMNX.

Performance

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGLX achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than PCMNX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BPGLX has outperformed PCMNX with an annualized return of 7.82%, while PCMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.

BPGLX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: 7.82%

PCMNX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: 1.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	8.13%	19.02%	8.56%	9.69%	-16.82%	8.09%	13.84%	19.05%	-7.56%	17.08%
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments	1.36%	4.52%	0.85%	5.54%	-7.30%	0.70%	4.63%	7.32%	0.85%	4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGLX and PCMNX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996	0.01

Over the past year, BPGLX and PCMNX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BPGLX vs. PCMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGLX

BPGLX Risk / Return Rank: 72
BPGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BPGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BPGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BPGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BPGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PCMNX

PCMNX Risk / Return Rank: 73
PCMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PCMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PCMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PCMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PCMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPGLX	PCMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.99	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	4.55	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.81	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	2.50	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	7.55	+4.48

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the PCMNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGLX and PCMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGLX drawdown since its inception was -53.03%, which is greater than PCMNX's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGLX and PCMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPGLX	PCMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.03%	-11.62%	-41.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-2.69%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.25%	-4.41%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.24%	-11.62%	-10.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.37%	-11.62%	-11.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.78%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-1.39%	-4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	0.86%	+1.25%

Volatility

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Volatility Comparison

UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) at 0.54%. This indicates that BPGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPGLX	PCMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	0.54%	+3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	1.67%	+7.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	2.26%	+8.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.73%	3.07%	+7.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.88%	3.35%	+7.53%

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGLX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PCMNX's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPGLX vs. PCMNX - Dividend Comparison

BPGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than PCMNX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund	1.92%	2.08%	2.02%	2.37%	4.65%	18.98%	1.78%	7.15%	0.00%	1.64%	2.42%	2.83%
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments	2.82%	2.49%	2.58%	2.37%	2.30%	2.38%	2.47%	3.41%	3.11%	2.89%	3.33%	3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPGLX and PCMNX in my portfolio?

BPGLX and PCMNX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPGLX or PCMNX?

BPGLX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to PCMNX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGLX dropped -53.03% vs PCMNX's -11.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.