PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAGHX vs. AOTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) and Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAGHX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than AOTIX's 24.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RAGHX has underperformed AOTIX with an annualized return of 6.69%, while AOTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


RAGHX

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.20%
6M
2.22%
YTD
-0.47%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
1.69%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
6.69%
ALL TIME*
8.64%

AOTIX

1D
4.06%
1M
-3.61%
6M
11.12%
YTD
24.14%
1Y
46.83%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RAGHX
Virtus Health Sciences Fund
-0.47%7.23%-2.33%2.57%-11.64%25.44%13.76%26.69%4.37%17.33%
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
24.14%29.73%5.44%17.83%-22.10%-0.26%20.78%17.66%-16.62%38.37%

Correlation

The correlation between RAGHX and AOTIX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2004

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between RAGHX and AOTIX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAGHX vs. AOTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAGHX
RAGHX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RAGHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAGHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAGHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RAGHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAGHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AOTIX
AOTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AOTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) and Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAGHXAOTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.17

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

9.98

-8.32

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAGHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the AOTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAGHX and AOTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAGHX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, smaller than the maximum AOTIX drawdown of -68.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAGHX and AOTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAGHXAOTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-68.42%

+28.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.94%

-13.92%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-17.76%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.14%

-34.86%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

-38.05%

+10.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-10.43%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-18.57%

+11.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

4.42%

+2.66%

Volatility

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) is 6.41%, while Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that RAGHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAGHXAOTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

8.80%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

20.11%

-6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

22.33%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.33%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

17.84%

-0.26%

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAGHX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than AOTIX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAGHX vs. AOTIX - Dividend Comparison

RAGHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.68%3.33%6.13%3.48%3.15%1.94%1.40%2.37%2.81%1.60%1.91%1.10%
RAGHX
Virtus Health Sciences Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.51%21.85%14.50%6.89%16.12%0.00%0.00%23.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAGHX and AOTIX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOTIX has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to RAGHX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAGHX dropped -40.23% vs AOTIX's -68.42%.

AOTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAGHX and AOTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer