PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOTIX vs. DRMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTIX achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly higher than DRMCX's 15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AOTIX has underperformed DRMCX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while DRMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.


AOTIX

1D
1.28%
1M
12.58%
YTD
33.86%
6M
38.86%
1Y
65.63%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.00%

DRMCX

1D
0.59%
1M
8.02%
YTD
15.08%
6M
12.70%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
33.86%29.73%5.44%17.83%-22.10%-0.26%20.78%17.66%-16.62%38.37%
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
15.08%18.09%20.49%24.81%-32.59%14.91%55.27%41.73%-11.16%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTIX and DRMCX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2004

0.63

The correlation between AOTIX and DRMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOTIX vs. DRMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTIX
AOTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AOTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DRMCX
DRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOTIXDRMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.23

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

1.81

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.89

6.39

+12.51

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the DRMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTIX and DRMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOTIXDRMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

1.31

+2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.64

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.32

+0.14

Drawdowns

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTIX drawdown since its inception was -68.42%, roughly equal to the maximum DRMCX drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTIX and DRMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOTIXDRMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.42%

-67.97%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-13.75%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-26.83%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.18%

-43.47%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.05%

-43.47%

+5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.66%

-22.10%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.90%

-0.40%

Volatility

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) at 5.07%. This indicates that AOTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOTIXDRMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

5.07%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

14.97%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

18.99%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

24.04%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

23.60%

-6.20%

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DRMCX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOTIX vs. DRMCX - Dividend Comparison

AOTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than DRMCX's 14.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.48%3.33%6.13%3.48%3.15%1.94%1.40%2.37%2.81%1.60%1.91%1.10%
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
14.37%16.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.44%9.02%4.12%14.34%8.78%7.35%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOTIX and DRMCX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOTIX has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to DRMCX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTIX dropped -68.42% vs DRMCX's -67.97%.

AOTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOTIX and DRMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer