RACK vs. WGMI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. RACK is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

RACK vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RACK

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.66%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -20.83%
• 6M: 6.88%
• YTD: 36.48%
• 1Y: 104.26%
• 3Y*: 43.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RACK vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	-7.65%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	-26.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RACK and WGMI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026	0.78

Return for Risk

RACK vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RACK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 45
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RACK vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RACK	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.09	—

Drawdowns

RACK vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RACK	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-85.76%	+72.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.90%	-27.56%	+16.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-42.13%	+35.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RACK	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	56.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.54%	77.51%	-25.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.54%	81.51%	-29.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.54%	81.51%	-29.97%

RACK vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RACK vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither RACK nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RACK and WGMI in my portfolio?

RACK and WGMI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RACK or WGMI?

On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RACK or WGMI?

RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RACK or WGMI?

RACK and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RACK and WGMI?

RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while WGMI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.75% for WGMI.